So is X seeing roughly utilization, particularly within the wake of the U.S. election?
As a result of the experiences are broadly conflicted. Based mostly on third social gathering insights, X is shedding thousands and thousands of customers each week, whereas different platforms like Threads and Bluesky proceed to realize traction.
But, X itself, which is the one supply of really correct X utilization data, continues to report report utilization, with its newest replace being that “energetic consumer seconds”, its most popular efficiency metric, reached a report excessive in 2024.
As you may see, X claims that whole energetic consumer seconds, per day, are up 10% year-over-year, whereas video views are additionally booming within the app.
So which is it? Is X stretching the reality with its knowledge, or are the third social gathering analytics suppliers, which don’t have entry to X’s full knowledge set, getting the numbers improper?
First off, let’s take a look at X’s knowledge. 364 billion whole energetic consumer seconds per day equates to 24 minutes per consumer, per day, based mostly on X having a reported 250 million each day actives.
That’s clearly loads, nevertheless it’s not as a lot as X claimed again in March, when it stated that customers are spending half-hour per day within the app on common.
So it’s tough to see how this might be a “report”.
X additionally claimed in March that it was seeing 8 billion cumulative energetic consumer minutes per day, on common, which might equate to 417 billion seconds.
Now, X might have been seeing extra utilization earlier within the yr, which has eased again since, and settled into the above-noted 364 billion whole seconds on common. However both manner, based mostly on these knowledge notes, it’s doubtless that X is now seeing much less utilization than it had been.
24 minutes per consumer, per day can be lower than the 38 minutes per day that customers have been reportedly spending on Twitter a number of years again, so once more, it’s exhausting to see how this might be a “report”, even accounting for variances in how Twitter calculated energetic minutes versus how X is measuring energetic seconds (Twitter reportedly counted any a part of a minute as an energetic minute, so even utilizing the app for an additional second inside a brand new minute could be rounded up).
Nevertheless it might be a report since X itself has been recording energetic consumer seconds as a stat. Which is 2 years. So possibly, it is a year-over-year report, although I’m not even certain that might be correct, based mostly on the above reporting.
Utilizing X’s personal knowledge, it does look like X is seeing much less utilization over time, no more, but it’s re-framing this as a win.
Which is on theme for X, which recurrently experiences deceptive or cherry-picked knowledge factors. However it’s value additionally noting that whereas X is probably going seeing much less utilization than it had been, it’s nonetheless seeing a number of exercise, greater than most of the experiences which were touting the platform’s demise recommend.
And possibly, within the wake of Donald Trump’s victory within the Presidential Election, X might see a resurgence, as extra folks query whether or not the platform’s shift to a extra right-wing aligned perspective is as detrimental a transfer as initially suspected.
With half of American voters supporting Trump, many manufacturers will now be questioning whether or not they need to head again to X in an effort to attain a wider viewers, and that would make it a extra acceptable, and influential app as soon as once more.
However is X seeing report excessive utilization?
Look, I think not, and that’s happening X’s personal reporting, and there are undoubtedly questions on its various knowledge factors on this respect.
And once more, with experiences additionally suggesting that thousands and thousands of individuals are leaving the app (which can be at the least partially supported by X’s personal reporting), it does look like X is declining to a point.
However once more, doubtless not as a lot as you’d anticipate.